A Brief Explanation of the NO-713 and Public Trust Doctrine Lawsuits

INITIATIVE I-713

    1. The constitutional challenge of Initiative 713 was filed in Thurston County Superior court by the Citizens for Responsible Wildlife Management Political Action Committee (CRWM PAC), with which we are affiliated.

    2.   On July 13th, 2001, the judge assigned to hear the challenge ruled in favor of the state. Following a review of his written opinion and consultation with our attorney and the affected parties, a decision was made to appeal. On March 1, 2002 the case went to the State Supreme Court for a decision  on whether it will be heard on direct appeal or sent down to the Appeals Court for a hearing at that level first.

     

    3.   The challenge is based on:

    The Washington State Constitution

    a.  "no bill shall embrace more than one subject, and that shall be expressed in the title”

    b.  “no act shall ever be revised or amended by mere reference to its title, but the act revised or the section amended shall be set forth in full length”

         

          The United States Constitution

    a. reserves the power to regulate interstate commerce to the federal government. I713 violates the Commerce Clause in that it places an impermissible restriction on interstate trade of animal fur.

    4.     We anticipate that this case will go to the State Supreme Court for the final decision.

    5.      If successful, this lawsuit will make I713 null and void.

     

    THE PUBLIC TRUST DOCTRINE

     1.   This lawsuit is based on the Public Trust Doctrine (PTD), which has its roots in the Magna Carta and is a core natural resources management principle of government, Case law,  and our State and Federal Constitutions. The doctrine, simply stated, recognizes that sovereign  (representative government) has the sole and exclusive administrative obligation and responsibility to protect, manage and conserve navigable waters, fish and wildlife for the enjoyment and use by the public for transportation, commerce and related activities and purposes.

    2.   This lawsuit was also filed by the CRWM  PAC and has been researched and prepared by a reputable law firm that has successfully argued at the U.S. Supreme Court level.

    3.   We anticipate that this lawsuit will be decided at the U.S. Supreme Court level. 

    4.   When successful, this lawsuit will overturn any initiatives regulating fish and wildlife previously passed in Washington (I655 & I713, if the constitutional challenge is not successful) as well as prohibit any future ones.  

    5.   The PTD lawsuit is in Thurston County Superior Court waiting to be scheduled for a hearing, which we anticipate will be the last of October or November, 2002.

Lawsuits and attorneys are expensive! 

  • It is critical that ALL hunters, fishers, trappers, and other concerned parties participate by donating money on a continual basis, actively raising funds, and helping out in any other way they can.

  • We anticipate that the Public Trust Doctrine suit will take approximately two years to wind its way through the court system, therefore, money must come in throughout this period. We encourage all concerned persons to budget a monthly amount and send it to the CRWM Legal Fund until the lawsuits are settled. All donations whether monthly or otherwise are, of course, welcome

  •  

      PLEASE DO YOUR PART!!    

     

    THIS COULD BE THE “LIGHT AT THE END OF THE TUNNEL” FOR ALL FISHERS, TRAPPERS, AND HUNTERS!!  

     Make Checks Payable To:  CRWM Legal Fund

     

    Mail to:

    CRWM Legal Fund

     P.O. Box 14245

    Tumwater, WA  98511-4245

    For more information call 360-385-9294